Content reviewers
We are building a panel of credentialed professionals to check factual accuracy and flag health claims on published content. Reviewer positions are currently being filled.
How it works
PeptideBase publishes educational compound research profiles and pharmacy compliance content. Each article covers mechanism, evidence base, regulatory status, and provider availability for a specific compound or compound class.
Reviewers will check factual accuracy and flag health claims that overstate the available evidence — for example, claims that extrapolate animal data to human outcomes, or regulatory framing that misrepresents 503A compounding rules. They will not write or edit prose and will have no editorial control over what is published.
Each reviewer will cover specific compound areas based on their credential and publication history. When a reviewer approves an article, their byline will appear permanently: “Reviewed by [Name], [Credential]”. Their institutional profile and key publications will be linked below.
What reviewers will do
- Check factual accuracy of compound descriptions
- Flag claims that overstate human evidence
- Flag regulatory framing errors (503A/503B, FDA status)
- Confirm mechanistic descriptions are defensible
What reviewers won't do
- Write, edit, or contribute prose
- Endorse any provider, compound, or brand
- Have editorial control over what is published
- Provide medical advice or clinical recommendations
Reviewers
Pending
Reviewer positions are currently being filled. This page will be updated as credentialed reviewers join the program.