Skip to main content

Editorial Policy

How we source and publish content.

PeptideBase is an educational platform. Everything published here is governed by this policy.

Last updated:

01

Sourcing Standards

All provider data on PeptideBase is sourced from publicly available information — provider websites, official listings, and verifiable public records. We do not publish information that cannot be sourced.

Peptide educational content is based on publicly available research literature. Descriptions are educational summaries — not clinical guidance. Fields with no sourced data are left blank or shown as “not available.” We do not infer or extrapolate.

Provider ratings are passed through unchanged from third-party platforms (Google, Trustpilot). The source is always displayed alongside any rating. PeptideBase does not generate, adjust, or normalise ratings.

02

Medical Review Process

Status: In development

PeptideBase is actively recruiting credentialed reviewers — physicians, pharmacists, and researchers — to provide oversight of the educational content layer. This process is not yet live. Pages will be marked with a reviewer byline once the review system is operational.

Until formal medical review is live, peptide content is reviewed internally against published literature for factual accuracy and compliance with the content guardrails in this policy.

PeptideBase does not publish dosing guidance, cycle lengths, injection instructions, or prescribing recommendations — regardless of source. This restriction is unconditional and applies to all content on the platform.

Interested in contributing as a reviewer? See the contact section on our About page.

03

Conflicts of Interest

PeptideBase is pre-advertising. No advertising revenue is currently accepted. No provider has paid for editorial coverage, improved ranking position, or verified status.

Verification status reflects a manual data accuracy review — not a commercial relationship. See the full definition of Verified.

04

Corrections & Updates

Provider data is reviewed on a rolling basis. If a provider's listing is inaccurate, the provider or a user can submit a correction request to [email protected] with “Provider correction” in the subject line.

Corrections to peptide educational content can be submitted to the same address with a source citation. We review all correction requests against available sources. If a correction is substantive, it will be reflected in the content and the page's last-updated timestamp.

Policy updates

This policy was last updated . Material changes to sourcing standards or the medical review process will be reflected here with an updated date.

Free newsletter

The Peptide Research Digest

Weekly analysis on providers, sourcing and compounds — from the team behind PeptideBase.

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime. Privacy policy.

Free Guide

The Peptide Research Digest

Get our free provider vetting guide — plus weekly research briefings on peptide sourcing, COA verification, and clinical developments.

No spam.